Current:Home > NewsThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -FinanceMind
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-16 02:27:44
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- The hip-hop verse that changed my life
- Arraignment set for Mar-a-Lago property manager in Trump’s classified documents case
- Michael Oher alleges 'Blind Side' family deceived him into conservatorship for financial gain
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Iran claims there will be no restrictions on access to money released in U.S. prisoner exchange
- New Paraguay president stresses South American country’s ties with Taiwan at swearing-in ceremony
- Denver police officer fatally shoots man holding a marker she thought was a knife, investigators say
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- This 'Evergreen' LA noir novel imagines the post-WWII reality of Japanese Americans
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Intersex surgery stole their joy. Now they're trying to get it back.
- Explosive materials in New Jersey home caused blast that killed 2 men, 2 children, officials say
- Group behind Montana youth climate lawsuit has lawsuits in 3 other state courts: What to know
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Body of man found floating in Colorado River in western Arizona identified
- Ravens teammates remember Alex Collins after RB's death: 'Tell your people you love them'
- The problem with treating Bama Rush TikTokers like famous reality stars
Recommendation
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Lithium-ion battery fires from electric cars, bikes and scooters are on the rise. Are firefighters ready?
NYC outdoor dining sheds were a celebrated pandemic-era innovation. Now, there’s a new set of rules
'Reinventing Elvis' reveals why Presley nearly canceled his '68 Comeback Special live set
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
Who qualifies for the first 2024 Republican presidential debate?
Pet daycare flooding kills several dogs in Washington DC; Firefighter calls staff heroes
New Paraguay president stresses South American country’s ties with Taiwan at swearing-in ceremony